Live fuel-cost counter

Extra fuel burn while Delta waits for Amazon Leo

Best-estimate dollars from the drag of older Ku/Ka radome antennas versus Starlink’s low-profile aviation terminal — accumulated since the counter window opened, ticking upward every second.

Estimated extra fuel cost
$0.00
Model estimate · not audited
Burn rate —
Daily rate —
Since 2026-03-30 Updated —

Key assumptions

    Leo 2028 vs Starlink now

    Delta and Amazon announced Amazon Leo (formerly Project Kuiper) for in-flight connectivity, with initial installation on about 500 aircraft beginning in 2028. United, by contrast, began installing Starlink in 2025 and by late September 2026 had equipped roughly a third of its tracked fleet — hundreds of aircraft already flying a low-profile electronically steered array.

    This site does not argue that Leo will be worse connectivity. It isolates one measurable opportunity cost of the later timeline: fuel. Public statements in the 2026 Ryanair–Starlink exchange put legacy high-profile radomes near a ~2% fuel penalty and Starlink’s current aviation terminal near ~0.3% on a 737-class burn. The difference is the drag Delta continues to pay on every hour that could already have been on a Starlink-class antenna under a United-like rollout pace.

    The counter starts ~six months before today (default ) and integrates that extra burn × Jet A price × counterfactual aircraft-hours. Every input lives in js/config.js so the model can be tightened as better data arrives.

    Framing: Ed Bastian’s Leo bet trades near-term antenna-drag savings (and Starlink’s proven airline install cadence) for a 2028 partner stack. This page tracks only the fuel side of that trade — empirically, and labeled as estimates.